Passion, non so se ti riferisci alla 'dark matter', comunque dovresti fornire la fonte delle tue speculazioni, che non mi sono chiare. Una scoperta dell'infrazione al 2° principio della termodinamica sarebbe qualcosa di così eclatante da dare immediata fama e notorietà a chi evidenzia questa eccezione, ma non mi sembra ci sia stato niente, se hai informazioni contrarie postale senza indugio.

Sull'aspetto big-bang e dark matter-CMB (cosmic microwave background) sono interessanti queste conclusioni, che però non citato nessuna rivoluzione nelle considerazioni termodinamiche


Quote:
In summary, a successful Big Bang cosmology theory must fit with all available astronomical observations (known as the concordance model), in particular the CMB. In cosmology the CMB is explained as relic radiation from the big bang, originally at thousands of degrees kelvin but red shifted down to microwave by the expansion of the universe over the last thirteen billion years. The anisotropies in the CMB are explained as acoustic oscillations in the photon-baryon plasma (prior to the emission of the CMB after the photons decouple from the baryons at 379,000 years after the Big Bang) whose restoring force is gravity.[39] Ordinary (baryonic) matter interacts strongly with radiation whereas, by definition, dark matter does not—though both affect the oscillations by their gravity—so the two forms of matter will have different effects. The power spectrum of the CMB anisotropies shows a large main peak and smaller successive peaks, resolved down to the third peak as of 2009.e.g..[38] The main peak tells you most about the density of baryonic matter and the third peak most about the density of dark matter (see Cosmic microwave background radiation#Primary anisotropy).

"Data speak for themselves" -Reverend Thomas Bayes 1702-1761
P(Ai|E)=(P(E|Ai)P(Ai))/P(E)