Purtroppo, e non capisco perché, il codice per le tabelle non è quello giusto, forse bisogna chiedere a Egidio. GPT5 mi dice che probabilmente il tag per le tabelle non è supportato. Proviamo altri metodi.
OK, questo sembra che funzioni almeno parzialmente, ossia con il codice HTML le tabella escono chiaramente. Dato che si tratta di lavoro, Antrea se vuole effettuerà il lavoro certosino di copiare e incollare le tabelle in un suo documento word assieme al precedente testo. Buona fortuna.
Overview
Weighted, repeatable scoring method to rank soils for human inhumation. Convert measured values to 0–100 scores, apply weights, compute weighted sum and classify.
1. Default parameter weights
Parameter |
Code |
Weight |
|---|
| Depth to groundwater | DW | 18 |
| Hydraulic conductivity | K | 15 |
| Microbial attenuation | MICRO | 10 |
| Low-permeability layering | LAYER | 8 |
| Soil texture / drainage | TEX | 8 |
| Depth to bedrock / fractures / karst | ROCK | 7 |
| Slope / erosion | SLOPE | 6 |
| Organic carbon | OC | 6 |
| Cation exchange capacity | CEC | 4 |
| Frost shrink / swell | SHRINK | 4 |
| Land use / contamination history | HIST | 4 |
| pH | pH | 3 |
| Redox potential | Eh | 3 |
| Total | 100 |
2. Principal normalization thresholds (0–100)
Parameter |
Condition |
Score or score range |
|---|
Depth to groundwater (DW) |
Measured as metres below planned grave base |
≥5.0 m → 100; 3.0–5.0 m → linear 60→100; 1.5–3.0 m → linear 20→60; <1.5 m → 0 |
Hydraulic conductivity (K) |
Saturated vertical K, m/s |
≤1×10⁻⁸ → 100; 1×10⁻⁸–1×10⁻⁶ → linear 80→100; 1×10⁻⁶–1×10⁻⁴ → linear 30→80; ≥1×10⁻⁴ → 0 |
Low-permeability layering (LAYER) |
Continuous low-perm layer beneath burial zone |
Continuous ≥1.0 m → 100; discontinuous or 0.5–1.0 m → 60; absent → 0 |
Soil texture / drainage (TEX) |
Use texture + measured K |
Clay/silty-clay (low K) → 90–100; loams → 60–89; coarse sands/gravels → 0–40 |
Microbial attenuation (MICRO) |
Composite lab/tracer and environmental factors |
High attenuation → 100; moderate → 60; low/transport observed → 0 |
Depth to bedrock / ROCK |
Distance to competent bedrock and fracture/karst presence |
>10 m intact → 100; 3–10 m or minor fractures → 50; <3 m, fractured or karst → 0 |
Organic carbon (OC) |
Percent by weight |
0.5–2.0% favourable (score ~50–90 linear); <0.5% → lower (30–50); >5% → reduced score (~20) |
CEC |
meq/100 g |
≥20 → 100; 10–20 → 60–99 linear; <10 → 20 |
pH |
Soil pH at burial depth |
6.0–8.0 → 100; 5.0–6.0 or 8.0–9.0 → 60; <5 or >9 → 0 |
Redox potential (Eh) |
At burial depth |
Oxic (>+300 mV) → 100; Suboxic (0→+300 mV) → 60; Anoxic (<0 mV) → 0 |
Slope / erosion (SLOPE) |
Surface slope and erosion susceptibility |
<5% stable → 100; 5–15% moderate → 60; >15% or active erosion → 0 |
3. Example site-ranking table (fill measured values and computed scores)
Compute Total Score = Σ (weight × score) / 100. Classification: 85–100 Highly suitable; 70–84 Suitable; 50–69 Marginal; <50 Unsuitable.
Site |
DW |
K |
LAYER
(0–100) |
TEX
(0–100) |
OC |
CEC |
MICRO
(0–100) |
ROCK
(0–100) |
SLOPE
(0–100) |
pH
(0–100) |
Eh
(0–100) |
HIST
(0–100) |
Total Score |
Class |
|---|
m | (0–100) |
m/s | (0–100) |
% | (0–100) |
meq/100g | (0–100) |
|---|
Example A |
6.2 | 100 |
5.0E-9 | 100 |
100 |
90 |
1.2 | 80 |
25 | 100 |
90 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
96 |
Highly suitable |
Example B |
2.0 | 40 |
1.0E-5 | 35 |
0 |
30 |
0.3 | 40 |
8 | 30 |
50 |
50 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
46 |
Marginal |
How to use
- Paste the HTML into the forum post source editor.
- Replace example numbers with measured values and normalized scores (0–100) per the normalization table.
- Compute Total Score = Σ(weight × score) / 100 and set Class accordingly.
