Prego, è stato utile riprendere questo argomento generalmente ignorato. Dopo varie, forse troppe iterazioni con GPT5, tanto che adesso mi fermo, siamo arrivati a un punto credo sufficientemente plausibile. GPT5 propone 3 soluzioni, con vari livelli di conservativismo.
Envelope-Fitting Bounds on Flat Rock Surface Synthesis: Simple Envelope-Fitting Bounds for a Flat Rock Surface
When fitting a straight Mohr–Coulomb line to the curved Hoek–Brown envelope over
0 ≤ σ′₃ ≤ σ′₃₋ₘₐₓ, you need a practical choice for
σ′₃₋ₘₐₓ that doesn’t rely on knowing the ultimate capacity or running
finite-element models. Three widely used, flat-surface bounds are:
Constant-Fraction of Intact Strength
Formula:
σ′₃₋ₘₐₓ = 0.25 · σci
Rationale:
Hoek & Brown (1980) observed that, for shallow loads, the minor principal
stress range in jointed rock lies between 0.1·σci and 0.4·σci. A midpoint of
0.25·σci gives a representative upper bound without further data.
At-Rest Horizontal Stress (K₀) Approach
Formula:
σ′₃₋ₘₐₓ = K0 · γ · Df, K0 ≈ 1 − sin φ′
Rationale:
Prior to loading, a rock mass at depth Df supports a vertical
stress γ·Df. Taking its natural horizontal stress
σh′ = K₀·γ·Df as σ′₃₋ₘₐₓ ties the
envelope limit to the actual in-situ confinement.
Mid-Envelope Point via Rock Mass Parameters
Formula:
σ′₃₋ₘₐₓ = (s / mb) · σci
mb = mi · exp((GSI − 100) / (28 − 14D))
s = exp((GSI − 100) / (9 − 3D))
Rationale:
The term (mb·σ₃′/σci + s)a shifts the
Hoek–Brown curve from intact rock (s = 1) toward jointed mass (s < 1). Setting
mb·σ₃′/σci = s locates the stress where intact-rock
and joint-mass contributions are equal—an intuitive “mid-curve” bound.
Conservatism Comparison
Method |
Typical Value* |
Conservatism (Lower σ′₃₋ₘₐₓ) |
|---|
0.25 · σci |
12.5 MPa |
Moderate |
K₀·γ·Df
(K₀≈0.5, γ=25 kN/m³, Df=2 m) |
25 kPa |
High |
(s / mb) · σci
(e.g. s=0.01, mb=5, σci=50 MPa) |
0.1 MPa |
Very High |
*Example assumes σci = 50 MPa, φ′≈30° ⇒ K₀≈0.5,
γ=25 kN/m³, Df=2 m, GSI=50,
D=0.5.